Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Pol Martin Tiffon vs Johan Nikles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tiffon vs Nikles analysis and find out who is favored!
Pol Martin Tiffon vs Johan Nikles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tiffon 1 - 3 Nikles
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tiffon has won 47.69% of points on their second serve, while Nikles has won 46.29%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tiffon, in recent form, has won 56.8% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nikles has won 53.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.14% and 39.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tiffon has saved 56.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nikles has saved 60.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tiffon has won 61.19% of matches played (W/L 41/ 26), with Nikles winning 62.16% (W/L 23/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tiffon has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 244/ 150), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Tiffon has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.92% of matches (W/L 36/ 17), where as Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Tiffon winning 1 times and Nikles being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Tiffon winning 3 and Nikles winning 6. The last match between Tiffon and Nikles was at the M25 Hammamet, 17-02-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Pol Martin Tiffon getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:6:56.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tiffon and Nikles have played a deciding set 2 times, with Tiffon winning 1 times and Nikles 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Tiffon winning 0, and Nikles 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tiffon has played against opponents with an average rank of 206.6 while Nikles has played against players with an average rank of 114.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tiffon has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nikles has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tiffon has converted 41.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nikles has converted 47% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
437
Rank
235
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total3
0
Hard0
1
Clay3
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
868
Rank
256
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
61% (266-168)
Career Total W/L
58% (265-194)
65% (26-14)
YTD W/L
62% (23-14)
$5,575
Career Prize Money
$11,650
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Pol Martin Tiffon | Johan Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 6 |
| Games Won | 47 | 47 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 23 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:6:56 | 2:6:56 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (185/302) | 68% (214/317) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (110/185) | 57% (123/214) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (48/117) | 43% (44/103) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (21/46) | 56% (20/36) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (150/317) | 48% (144/302) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Johan Nikles
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
62 of
99)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
2
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
88
|
||||
| 7-5 7-6(7) |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
65%
(
53 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
78)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 5-3 ret. |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve %
58%
(
19 of
33)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
9 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
32
Total Points Won
26
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 2-6 7-5 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
75%
(
83 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
0
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
10
53%
(
44 of
83)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
29%
(
8 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
53%
(
59 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
104)
108
Total Points Won
107
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Pol Martin Tiffon | Johan Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (26/14) | 62% (23/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (56/35) | 62% (52/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (456/376) | 56% (423/336) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (22/12) | 65% (20/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.02 |
| Aces Total | 74 | 8 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 154 | 60 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:12 | 1:16:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 232.93 | 114.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (1496/2626) | 69% (1269/1848) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (1026/1496) | 60% (767/1269) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (542/1130) | 46% (268/579) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (154/365) | 47% (94/200) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (1244/2802) | 44% (806/1816) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (3/3) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (23/9) | 68% (21/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (26/40) | 61% (22/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (2/6) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 36% (4/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (25/23) | 79% (28/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (25/2) | 21% (28/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (15/3) | 11% (9/1) |
Pol Martin Tiffon Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Andrea Guerrieri
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Pedro Rodenas
44%
(
35 of
80)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
90)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
67%
(
30 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-7(1) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
82%
(
82 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
98)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
94
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Iliyan Radulov
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Benjamin Winter Lopez
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Albert Pedrico Kravtsov
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Guy Den Ouden
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
63
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Pol Martin Tiffon
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Mario Martinez Serrano
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Johan Nikles
60%
(
71 of
119)
1st Serve %
75%
(
79 of
106)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
53 of
79)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
40%
(
48 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
106)
110
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Luka Pavlovic
64%
(
78 of
122)
1st Serve %
47%
(
51 of
108)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
59%
(
26 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
12%
(
2 of
17)
36%
(
44 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
118
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Johan Nikles
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jerome Kym
Player
Johan Nikles
69%
(
72 of
104)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
42%
(
44 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
108
Total Points Won
88
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Seita Watanabe
86%
(
73 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
71 of
95)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
42 of
73)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matteo Fondriest
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tiffon Vs Nikles Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Tiffon are available here and Nikles photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
